![Digital coax to digital optical converter](https://knopkazmeya.com/18.png)
![digital coax to digital optical converter digital coax to digital optical converter](https://pg-cdn-a2.datacaciques.com/00/Mzk1Mw/18/05/22/5a8cyv17ws3y5423/95e371bcdee0f060.jpg)
USB is the only format that uses " packetized" data streams the others rely on continuous data streams. Other experts claimed optical connections are more jitter-prone than the other options. In my experience this can never be perfect, just made closer and closer to irrelevance." In the ideal world, the data are clocked in by and buffered in the DAC (asynchronous mode) and then de-jittered before conversion. But the audio we hear is analog and real-world devices are subject to a variety of interferences including data-induced jitter, other process-induced jitter, (and) common- and differential-mode electromagnetic noise. He also said, "Of course digital bits-are-bits and with due care, each of the three interfaces (USB, Toslink, coaxial) can deliver the same data at approximately the same time. Toslink (left), coaxial (center), and USB (right) digital audio connectors. The better the rendering device (DAC), the smaller the difference."
#DIGITAL COAX TO DIGITAL OPTICAL CONVERTER PC#
Which is best? Well, that sort of depends on the DAC and the source (is it a server, PC or optical disc?) as well as the interface and even the digital interconnect cable. Again, Stuart has been working with digital since the early days, and he started with this, "You will have readers who disagree, and that's fine.
![digital coax to digital optical converter digital coax to digital optical converter](https://cnctincbkt.s3.amazonaws.com/cnctinc.com/images/Product/Large/131746508905935086.jpg)
I also heard from Meridian Audio's founder, digital pioneer Bob Stuart. A tie between Toslink and USB (Moffat leans slightly in favor of USB).AES-EBU has the best potential, but it's rarely found in consumer gear.Getting back to the original question - which connection scheme sounds best - he said, "All I can do is make generalizations, which are very much system and grounding dependent." He spelled out his preferences in the following order: Moffat concedes USB has greatly improved since it was introduced. He thinks USB uses the most complex processing to encode at the source and decode at playback, which causes him to look askance at that medium. AES/EBU is more suitable for longer cable runs than coaxial connections, and so it's "less susceptible to common mode high frequency crap." That's why recording studios use AES/EBU digital cables. Moffat noted that coaxial and AES/EBU digital connections are well isolated with transformers in the best gear, but "capacitive leaks" reduce this advantage greatly at higher frequencies. Moffat started designing high-end digital converters way back in the '80s at Theta Digital, so he's grappled with the finer details of the audio arts longer than most. Schiit Audio's Mike Moffat was the first to respond, and he had plenty to say. Which connection/interface sounds best: USB, Toslink (aka optical), coaxial or AES/EBU (Audio Engineering Society/European Broadcasting Union)? I turned to the experts and asked them, what's best and why? The CD debuted back in 1982 and computer audio is now fully entrenched, but even so, we still haven't reached a consensus. For as long as I can remember audiophiles have struggled to find the best sounding digital connections.
![Digital coax to digital optical converter](https://knopkazmeya.com/18.png)